In his article “Refuting patients’ obligations to clinical
training: a critical analysis of the arguments for an obligation of patients to
participate in the clinical education of medical students” (2001), Jude T
Waterbury addresses the argument that clinical teaching of medical students is
vital for the future of medicine, and this learning process has a significant
impact in the patient’s care and autonomy.
Waterbury supports his claims by making a critical analysis on the main
arguments that have arisen: the furthering of medical education; compensation
when uninsured or unable to pay; an equitable return for the care received in a
teaching hospital; and fulfillment of a student’s need for or right to clinical
training. Waterbury’s purpose is to evaluate
each claim in order to find a solution to the controversy. In this article, Waterbury is very
informative and unbiased on any side of the argument; he presents a critical
analysis without any personal opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment