In Andy Wearn and Harsh
Bhoopatkar’s article, “Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination:
students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience” (2006), they
assert that medical students accept and support a formal consent process for
peer physical examination. They support
their claims by exploring the students view for formal consents; most students
had read the participant information sheet prior to signing with 78% giving
consent. The purpose of this article was
to show the opinions of the medical students in order to prove that peer
evaluation is important in the early clinical skills. The audience for this article was clinical
teachers and students undergoing residency in school.
No comments:
Post a Comment